36.3 F
Saturday, December 10, 2022

Pittsburgh Pirates 2014 Second Base Recap: Examining Neil Walker’s Career Year

Coming into the 2014 season, there were questions about which Neil Walker would show up. The second baseman had shown some positive trends the last few years, and if those trends continued, he could have been primed for a huge season offensively. That’s exactly what happened in 2014. Here is a quick look at those trends, and the 2014 results.


2010 – .167

2011 – .134

2012 – .146

2013 – .167

2014 – .195

The biggest improvement Walker saw this year was in his power production. His ISO has risen every year since 2011, after dropping from 2010 to 2011. Coming into the year, it was hard to say whether Walker was the 2010/2013 version, or the 2011/2012 version. His production in 2014 indicates the former. I don’t know if Walker’s power will continue to trend upward, and I don’t know if it will stay as high as his .195 ISO this year. But I don’t think it’s out of the question to project him for at least .167 going forward.


2010 – 17.7 K%/7.2 BB%

2011 – 16.9/8.2

2012 – 19.6/8.9

2013 – 15.4/9.1

2014 – 15.4/7.9

One encouraging thing about the 2013 season was that Walker posted a career low in strikeouts. He matched that mark in 2014. Unfortunately, the 2010-2013 seasons saw a steady increase in his walk rates, and that stopped in 2014 when he dropped down to a 7.9 BB%. Walker’s career walk rate is 8.3%, and I think that’s something you can expect going forward, rather than a return to the 2012-2013 numbers. If he hits for average, that would still put him in the .340-.350 OBP range.

As for the strikeouts, the fact that he’s putting the ball in play more often might be leading to his increase in power numbers. Along with the fact that his strikeouts are down, his ground ball rate is down the past two years. He was in the 42-44% range in 2011-2012, but dropped to he 38.5% range in 2013 and 2014. In turn, he saw an increase in fly balls, which combined with his HR/FB ratio, led to more homers. Walker was at a 13.9% HR/FB rate in 2014, so he’s probably not going to repeat his 23 home run season. His career 10.1% HR/FB ratio would have put him at 17 homers this year. That’s still good, but indicates that he probably won’t repeat the home run totals or the high ISO in the future.


2010 – .340

2011 – .315

2012 – .326

2013 – .274

2014 – .288

Walker’s BABIP took a huge drop in 2013, leading to his lowest average yet. He increased those results in 2014, and his .271 average was closer to his career mark of .273. The instinct here would be to assume Walker could still see more improvements with his average due to his BABIP getting closer to his career .307 mark in the future. While that is certainly possible, it ignores what we know about the changes Walker saw in 2013 and 2014. As noted above, he had an increase in fly balls. Typically, fly balls lead to the lowest BABIP of all hit types. The fact that he’s hitting more fly balls the last two years explains why his BABIP has dropped. He probably should be counted on to hit near .270 in the future, rather than expecting an increase in production.


2010: -16.4 UZR/150 / -8 DRS

2011: -4.4 / -3

2012: -1.4 / -4

2013: -0.8 / 9

2014: -8.4 / -2

Walker had a huge year offensively in 2014. However, the defense was a disappointment. The UZR trends heading into the year were strong, indicating that Walker was learning the position after a rough first year. This year he struggled at the position, and the eye test confirmed that he wasn’t the best defender at second base. Defensive numbers work best when taking multiple years of data, rather than one year. His career UZR/150 is -5.9 and he averages around negative 1-2 DRS each year. Walker continued a lot of good trends offensively, but did not continue the improvements defensively, and probably shouldn’t be counted on for strong defense going forward.

The Future

Walker had a breakout season offensively, but his defense raises questions about his future at second base. There have been calls to move him over to first base, although that raises two problems. For one, his bat doesn’t profile well at the first base position. His OPS this year ranked third among qualified second basemen. Even if he’s closer to his 2012-2013 numbers, he’d be top five offensively among second basemen. That same OPS this year would have ranked 10th out of 23 qualified first basemen. His 2012-2013 numbers would have ranked him closer to 15th out of 23 first basemen offensively. Walker is a top offensive second baseman, but would be below average at first base.

The other issue with moving Walker is that the Pirates currently have no option to take over at second. Josh Harrison could be an option, although he’s currently slated for third base. The other option in the future would be Alen Hanson, although he won’t be ready to start the 2015 season.

The Pirates moved Hanson to second base this year. Part of that was due to his struggles at the shortstop position, combined with the fact that Jordy Mercer has locked down his spot in the majors at shortstop. The Pirates also moved Hanson in order to speed up his timeline to the majors and get him on track to arrive in 2015.

Hanson has the bat and skills to be a leadoff guy and an above average hitter at second base. He should be expected to arrive in the majors in 2015. If he does well in his jump to the majors, he could take over as the starter at second base in 2016, at which point he would be the starter of the future. JaCoby Jones is another possibility for the long-term. He played shortstop in West Virginia, but it is doubtful that he will end up at that position in the majors. Second base seems more likely.

As for Walker, his future might depend on what happens with other positions, and how he follows up this career season. If he can show that it is more than a career season, then he could make sense at a corner position (although I’m not sure if third base is an option, due to his defensive struggles at second). Due to his rising cost in arbitration, it would seem more likely that Walker won’t be with the Pirates beyond 2016, if not sooner.

+ posts

Tim started Pirates Prospects in 2009 from his home in Virginia, which was 40 minutes from where Pedro Alvarez made his pro debut in Lynchburg. That year, the Lynchburg Hillcats won the Carolina League championship, and Pirates Prospects was born from Tim's reporting along the way. The site has grown over the years to include many more writers, and Tim has gone on to become a credentialed MLB reporter, producing Pirates Prospects each year, and will publish his 11th Prospect Guide this offseason. He has also served as the Pittsburgh Pirates correspondent for Baseball America since 2019. Behind the scenes, Tim is an avid music lover, and most of the money he gets paid to run this site goes to vinyl records.


Pirates Prospects has been independently owned and operated since 2009, entirely due to the support of our readers. The site is now completely free, funded entirely by user support. By supporting the site, you are supporting independent writers, one of the best Pittsburgh Pirates communities online, and our mission for the most complete Pirates coverage available.

Related articles

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Walker’s walk rate could have been negatively effected by the improving lineup around him also… As could the improvement in his other offensive numbers, including ISO numbers. If your getting better pitches to hit then walkers changing numbers would be expected. Less walks, more balls hit in play.


The issue with that increased fly ball rate is that most of it has come in the form of a steady increase in pop ups(4.3% to 10.9%), which is killing his BABIP. While that makes his 2014 HR/FB rate even more impressive, it also may be a stronger signal of coming regression.

FWIW, Baseball Heat Maps produces an Expected Home Runs metric based off batted ball data and had Walker at 20 last season and also didn’t have him in the top 100 Major League hitters in average fly ball distance.

Also not mentioned in the article, but his improvement from the right side was mostly BABIP driven with an ISO still under .100.

Despite all that, still a fantastic season that should be justly appreciated.


Walker doesn’t have to be a top 5 first baseman. If he ranks 10-15 in MLB as a 1b, that’s a hell of a lot better than having Davis/Gaby rank 28. I don’t think Pedro at 1b is going to do better. So move Walker to 1b, Josh to 2b and go get a slick fielding 3b with decent offense. Trade Pedro for pitching.


I guess I am finally going to ask this dumb question.

I have read that UZR does not take into consideration the shifts that the Pirate’s and other teams use. If that is the case, how can that be used as a barometer if you will, of a players defense? Its interesting to see that Cutch’s UZR went down in the same year that the Pirate’s started to use outfield shifts, and watching Walker play, albeit on a broadcast, and not in person, as a trip from Oregon to PA is a bit much at this point :), I see a pretty damn good fielder with some nice range.

So if UZR does not adjust for shifts, are we not short changing our entire team defense if we base our standard on it? Or am I missing something here?


No, you are not missing anything.

By the traditional numbers, Walker had a pretty decent defensive year:


2nd fewest errors (5) by a 2B in NL (3rd fewest in the majors)
2nd best fielding percentage (.992) in NL (3rd best in the majors)
4th most total chances (630) in NL
3rd most double plays turned (87) in NL

Obviously there is concern about Walker’s injury history affecting his performance and range, but so far it hasn’t shown up.


The other way to interpret that information is that if Walker doesn’t have the range to get to less routine balls, it will suppress his error rate. The chances and double plays are likely a product of Pirates league leading ground ball rate.


I know that the Pirates had a 1.70 GB/FB ratio and led the majors in that category from here:


I don’t know how many ground balls the Pirates actually gave up, how many were in the vicinity of Neil Walker, and how many went for hits. No stat for opposing team batting average on ground balls is listed.


I generally think too much is made by some of Walker’s UZR fluctuations, he is below average at 2nd, but I don’t think a one year drop means he is getting worse.

On the part about ground balls, the Pirates had the most against 2278.


Fangraphs also has an older defensive metric Revised Zone rating, large caveat I’m not sure how it treats shift plays, but the Pirates rank 8th for ball in the 2nd base zone and then 27th in making plays in that zone. And if you compare Walker’s RZR to other 2nd basemen since entering the league it is line with UZR suggesting that he doesn’t have great range for a 2nd baseman.

Lukas Sutton

Errors and Fielding % are poor ways to judge defense, since i can stand in one place and limit my chances for errors and up my %. I would also contend that his high DP total is a result partially of the team wanting GBs.


That is why I also included total chances. Walker had 630 total chances in 135 games played (4.67 chances per game). Chase Utley led the NL last year – 726 total chances in 147 games played (4.94 chances per game).

You can also be shifted to where the batter is likely to hit the ball. Should good positioning not be counted toward defensive prowess?

I understand the argument, you want some measure of the defensive skill of the player independent of everything else around him. I just don’t think that is possible.


Regarding “although I’m not sure if third base is an option, due to his defensive struggles at second” I am not sure why you think this way. Pedro had adequate range at 3B, he just couldn’t throw accurately. Could you imagine Pedro at 2B? Walker at 3B would be an upgrade over Pedro’s range, though he’s not as good a defensive option at either position compared to J-Hay.


Upgrading the infield defense is consistent with trying to be more ground ball oriented and pitching to contact. That would help both the young pitchers in the pipeline and any free agents who might be lured to the Bucs.

I think you are being a bit over optimistic in expecting Hanson to be ready before mid year 2016 – by all accounts he has some defensive issues and concerns over his maturity that need to be resolved.

Share article

Latest articles


Latest comments