Remember — It’s Not A Salary Dump If the Red Sox Do It

Over the weekend, the Red Sox and the Dodgers completed the most expensive trade in baseball history as the Red Sox shipped Adrian Gonzalez, Carl Crawford, Josh Beckett, and Nick Punto’s approximate $287M of future contracts to the Dodgers for 4 prospects and James Loney.

The Red Sox are responsible for only $11M of that $287M (roughly 3.8% of the total) commitment.  In return, they get “financial flexibility” and rid themselves of problems in the clubhouse, especially in the case of Beckett.  By all accounts Crawford was a tireless worker that had the misfortune of being injured a good portion of his tenure.  Gonzalez just never seemed to handle/want the mantle of being a team leader and got run over for it in the Boston media.

The Dodgers got back pitchers Rubby de la Rosa and Allen Webster, infielder Ivan de Jesus, and 1B/OF Jerry Sands as the longer-term pieces.  De Jesus is most likely just a utility infielder and Sands appears to be a potential Quad A player that thrived in favorable hitting environments in the minors.  That leaves de la Rosa, coming off of Tommy John surgery, and Webster as the primary hopes for this trade from a talent standpoint.

Rubby de la Rosa has a blazing fastball and a full arsenal of pitches at his disposal, but control has always been his hinderance.  If all clicks and he responds from his surgery, he’s a #2 pitcher.  Webster has a more standard profile of a low 90’s/touch mid 90’s fastball, curve, and changeup.  Webster’s concern is his slight build and how it may affect his long-term durability as a starter.

The general discourse nationally about this trade is that the Dodgers are going nuts on spending (as I predicted in late June, but not envisioning to this extent) and that the Red Sox are cleaning up the bad deals done by Ben Cherington’s predecessor, Theo Epstein.  They are being lauded for getting out from under bad deals and infusing talent into a downtrending farm system.  Boston media is saying that these trades are refreshing and that building from within, not wildly spending on free agency, is how the top Red Sox from earlier this decade were built.

But if the Pirates offload bloated salaries or players that weren’t great in the clubhouse, each trade gets accused of a salary dump and open for dissection on whether the team “won” or “lost” each individual trade.  If the Pirates do it, they’re quitters.  If the Red Sox do it, they are wisely reloading their franchise.  When, or if, Webster and de la Rosa don’t live up to their prospect expectations, will the trade still be viewed favorably because it was done by the Red Sox and they were able to start the payroll slate clean?

I guess it’s all a matter of perspective.  And or market share and national clout.

Starting in the very near future, this blog will shift into a Baseball Business Blog that looks at economic issues and implications for the Pirates and other teams throughout MLB.  If you have any suggestions for articles, please leave them in the comments below.

  • leanroastbeef
    August 29, 2012 3:06 pm

    Ideas for future topics:
    1. the current worth in dollars of former Pirate players – anyone from Bronson Arroyo to Brian Bixler – who are still active in the major leagues
    2. the tipping point in performance when a team friendly contract isn’t very team friendly

  • littlefieldsdo
    August 28, 2012 3:57 pm

    I can only assume my comments were removed because:
    1. You are intimidated by my luxurious hair
    or
    2. You can no longer blame your fav pic posing GM for his failures on the talent that the human that I allow to embody me left behind when he was canned. Question: when the human I allow to reside under my greatness traded the face of the franchise, the Pirates picked up the new face of the franchise and and a pretty good starting pitcher. What did your all-time favorite deal maker get when he traded the face of the franchise? Whatever it was, what I spend daily on conditioner, gel, and hair spray was worth more.
    or
    3. You can no longer think about corned beef on rye since your encounter with the brilliance that was/is/and always will be my follicles has ruined you on it.
    or
    4. Dallas McPherson

  • littlefieldshair
    August 28, 2012 2:02 pm

    I have four topics that you should write about:
    Dave Littlefield’s hair
    Dave Littlefield’s clothes
    Deliciously lean corned beef on rye
    Moneyball

  • That’s a lot of major league talent, overpaid or not, for what is likely to amount to 2 pitchers with one of them coming off Tommy John. Suddenly, the return for Jason Bay don’t look so bad!!

Menu